Skip to main content

It's like extremely Draculated.

Nothing but Trouble

(SPOILERS) Valkenvania’s a better title. Dan Aykroyd had that part right. He had to get something right in this monstrous misfire, which fails to ring the laughs or the horror, yet succeeds in being extremely grotesque, to the point of unpleasantness. Nothing but Trouble was a famous bomb, although one that’s now largely forgotten, since there were other more enormous bombs the same year, including Hudson Hawk and Highlander II: The Quickening. It also rather helped, along with Eddie Murphy’s Harlem Nights, to draw a line under that generation of SNL players as movie superstars (fortunately, Mike Myers was waiting in the wings). A revisit confirms it’s essentially the same mess it was the last time I saw it thirty years ago, but not without a certain repellent fascination.

The idea came from Aykroyd’s own speeding incident, whereby he was clocked in the middle of nowhere. It was written with his brother Peter, and Dan agreed to direct (and play dual roles) after Johns Hughes and Landis, and Ivan Reitman, rejected the screenplay. It seems Aykroyd was even angling to play the Chevy Chase role before Warner Bros suggested another name (and rejected Jeff Goldblum). Quite why they’d have been willing to put all their eggs in an Aykroyd basket is anyone’s guess. It wasn’t as if he’d proven himself a draw flying solo. So it may be they though Chase – also not exactly setting the world on fire by that point, excepting any Vacation sequels – might ignite some kind of notional alchemy. After all, Aykroyd had been a co-player in a string of ’80s hits (The Blues Brothers, Trading Places, Ghostbusters x2, Spies Like Us, Dragnet). He’d also, as writer (The Blues Brothers, Ghostbusters, Spies Like Us, Dragnet), never scored less than a modest success.

And this was supernatural too. Aykroyd was like a Slimer in ectoplasm with supernatural fare. Plus, the public loved spooky comedies (Beetlejuice). That may have been the thinking, if any exec assessment was even that extensive. Of course, when you throw in references to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (one Aykroyd himself made), you’re on less solid footing. Horror comedies had a rich tradition, but gross-out ones? You needed to be Sam Raimi or Peter Jackson to have that (niche) appeal. Like any such movie, then, Nothing but Trouble has been rewarded with cult status, such that almost a fifth of IMDB reviews give it full marks (only eclipsed by the number of reviews giving it 1/10).

The finished picture’s release was pushed back from December 1990 to February 1991, in order to tone down the violence, but the queasy tone remains in full force. We see Daniel Baldwin and his drug-dealer pals made to take a ride on rollercoaster Mr Bonestripper, which does what it says on the tin. Later, Judge Alvin Valkenheiser (Aykroyd) serves up some very dubious-looking hotdog sausages to his “guests”.

It’s the prosthetics that are most nightmarish, however, with Chase’s Chris Thorne (subjectively?) seeing Alvin’s nose transform into a penis. Later, 106-year old Alvin removes his wig and nose as he goes to bed. Alvin’s grandchildren Bobo (Aykroyd) and Lil’ Debbull (John Daveikis) are six-foot mutant foetal mud babies. By comparison, Candy’s drag act (he plays Bobo’s son Dennis and daughter Eldona) is positively innocuous.

Aykroyd (per Starlog) had it that his world was the real deal: “What transpires in this film really comes from American life… I know that there are people like this out among us”. But even with ace DP Dean Cundey lensing Nothing but Trouble, he only extracts the sense of a movie shot on an expansive set. There’s none of the unsettling nature of Tobe Hooper’s film or The X-Files’ later Home: just cartoonishness without laughs.

There seems to be an idea threaded in here that the murder victims have it coming, hence the drug dealers, and headlines of “Ex-Nazi rocket scientist disappears”, “Escaped killer’s trail evaporates” and “Hoffa – still missing”; Thorne, Alvin believes, is a banker who deserves a similar fate (Thorne insists he is actually a financial publisher); if that’s the case, the “Busload of Hari Krishnas disappears” clipping is what, a gag? Like Miami Blues Krishna humour?

That would also be the reason the judge lets Digital Underground go (members including Shock-G and one Tupac Shakur), whose performance of Same Song, in which Alvin joins in on the organ, is the movie’s absolute highlight. Aykroyd suddenly slides into a confident groove, and Nothing but Trouble is briefly delighted with its own strangeness in an absurdly infectious way.

Coming a close second is the third act Invasion of the Body Snatchers-esque reveal that, when Thorne and Diane (Moore) lead the authorities to Valkenvania, the latter are all fully on board with the judge’s illicit activities (“Alvin is something, isn’t he? And since you know, what you know, we’re going to have to come to some kind of agreement”). That’s pretty much a slam dunk for the conspiracy minded, regardless of whether Alvin’s town was reprehensibly undone by the United Coke company; Nothing but Trouble suggests Elite-mandated cannibalism, a cabal of secret, covert degeneracy among the ruling classes, underground mutations and inbreeding. And since Aykroyd loves his conspiracy theories – besides being part of the Hollywood establishment so quite feasibly up to his armpits in the same; why else would you make a movie quite so distasteful? – that may well be intentional.

Elsewhere, no one is able to ignite a spark, although "Brazillionaires" Valri Bromfield (Miss Purdah) and Taylor Negron (Fausto Squiriniszu) do their best, employing eccentric South American accents. As Negron – much more effective as Milo in the same year’s Last Boy Scout – tells it, they also improvised their own dialogue. The mutant twins are just grim, and if Aykroyd’s clearly having a ball as the judge, it’s only in the Digital Underground scene that he becomes comically engaging (a point of comparison might be the also grotesque elder Lo Pan in Big Trouble in Little China, where the performance is transfixing rather than simply repulsive).

Chase is expectedly barely there. Apparently, he behaved appallingly on set, expressing himself through loud farts. Early on, there’s a hint of his trademark deadpan (“Thanks for the espresso maker. And the bag of shit”) but no one bothered to give him anything funny to do or say, and simply trying to let down Eldona down gently isn’t enough. Candy’s alternately affable (Dennis) and lightly amusing (Eldona), but again, the material doesn’t give him the best opportunity.

As for Demi, who has been suggested as prominent force in Hollywood’s satanic elite, with the messed-up kids to prove it, Ghost came out while Nothing but Trouble was still filming. It seems she was away to her trailer from the start (that, or attending sabbats). One can’t really blame her (the trailer part, I mean), but then, she was also married to Mr Prima Donna at that point, since hubby was able to lay claim to the year’s most spectacularly out-of-control movie.

Valkenvania is reported by Wiki as costing $40m and variously stated as having gone $5m over budget: “I joyously spent $80 million of Warner Bros money on the movie I directed” claimed Akyroyd, per Wild and Crazy Guys (Nick de Semlyen). Candy pal Bob Crane was on set and commented “It was pure excess. A huge production for Dan to bite off as his first directorial effort. The premise just got too far out, the egos were rampant, and they were given to much money. They were in way over their heads”. Not helping matters was Aykroyd, initially at any rate, encouraging directing by committee, with each star having their own monitor and calling for retakes.

He was sanguine about the picture’s failure, incorrectly blaming the proximity of Sleeping with the Enemy and The Silence of the Lambs and suggesting, with Moore’s star power – the truth being, as the year’s other Demi toppers The Butcher’s Wife and Mortal Thoughts proved, she had none – it should have done better. Even without the subject matter, it’s debatable a comedy headlining Chase and Aykroyd would have struck gold at this point. Another year, and Wayne’s World was where comedy tastes lay. Dan was still eking out movie success, but in supporting turns, rather than Coneheads. And Chase was finished (see Memoirs of an Invisible Man). Valkenvania deserved to bomb, but it also deserves discovery as a curiosity; it’s one yielding unsettling subtexts, while being a fair way off from a cult commodity of quality.

Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

You ever heard the saying, “Don’t rob the bank across from the diner that has the best donuts in three counties”?

2 Guns (2013) (SPOILERS) Denzel Washington is such a reliable performer, that it can get a bit boring. You end up knowing every gesture or inflection in advance, whether he’s playing a good guy or a bad guy. And his films are generally at least half decent, so you end up seeing them. Even in Flight (or perhaps especially in Flight ; just watch him chugging down that vodka) where he’s giving it his Oscar-nominatable best, he seems too familiar. I think it may be because he’s an actor who is more effective the less he does. In 2 Guns he’s not doing less, but sometimes it seems like it. That’s because the last person I’d ever expect blows him off the screen; Mark Wahlberg.

In a few moments, you will have an experience that will seem completely real. It will be the result of your subconscious fears transformed into your conscious awareness.

Brainstorm (1983) (SPOILERS) Might Brainstorm have been the next big thing – a ground-breaking, game-changing cinematic spectacle that had as far reaching consequences as Star Wars (special effects) or Avatar (3D) – if only Douglas Trumbull had been allowed to persevere with his patented “Showscan” process (70mm film photographed and projected at 60 frames per second)? I suspect not; one only has to look at the not-so-far-removed experiment of Ang Lee with Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk , and how that went down like a bag of cold sick, to doubt that any innovation will necessarily catch on (although Trumbull at least had a narrative hinge on which to turn his “more real than real” imagery, whereas Lee’s pretty much boiled down to “because it was there”). Brainstorm ’s story is, though, like its title, possibly too cerebral, too much concerned with the consciousness and touting too little of the cloyingly affirmative that Bruce Rubin inevitably brings to his screenplays. T

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…