Skip to main content

I just popped some heroin and took a gas pipe.

The Happy Ending

(SPOILERS) Turgid melodrama that earned Jean Simmons a Best Actress Oscar nomination: there’s no contesting the quality of her performance, only the material she has available. Director Richard Brooks had earlier worked with his missus, far more successfully, in Elmer Gantry, and he only has himself to blame, since he also wrote and produced The Happy Ending.

Also uncontested is the quality of the cinematography from Conrad Hall, who would win an Oscar the same year for Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid; whatever issues the story has, it’s gorgeously shot. Simmons looks accordingly untouchable throughout, perhaps not the best approach – except to contrast how she sees herself with the reality – for an old soak housewife in an unfulfilling marriage. Indeed, this essential divide tends to undermine many of the movie’s positions, however persuasive Simmons is (and she is); Mary Wilson barely has a hair out of place, even when she’s OD-ing. When she meets old college friend Flo (Shirley Jones), Mary tells her she still looks 28, but if Simmons looks 35 that’s hardly much of an issue (Jones was 35 when the film was released, Simmons 40). If Flo were honest, she should have said Mary was fussing about nothing, but she takes the compliment and runs (telling Mary it’s because she isn’t married).

Contrastingly, Forsythe had turned 51, and while he’d increasingly nurse the silver fox sable that would culminate in Blake Carrington, he’d also move in an irreversibly plankish direction; by this point, we’re a long way from his Bogart-esque turn in The Trouble with Harry (ironically, one of Mary’s reveries is over Casablanca; she’s like a lush version of Mia Farrow in The Purple Rose of Cairo, given to fantasising away her life in the movies and incurring hubby’s indignation for refusing to accept never the twain shall meet).

Pauline Kael called The Happy Endingfatally misconceived”, opining it was “meant to be a message movie for women’s liberation, but this kind of movie never liberated anyone”. It’s difficult to see anything quite so demonstrative about its aims, really, though. It’s hardly Shirley Valentine. One would expect a position of empowerment to be reached, but Brooks’ infuriating flashback structure impedes the narrative from progressing in anything other than a fitful manner; a good third of The Happy Ending is spent in-flight to Nassau, as the course of Mary’s descent into domestic oblivion is charted.

It is, inevitably, a path of empty social norms replaced by further empty social norms (most of which revolve around material or emotional possessions/crutches). What Brooks seems to be suggesting, if taken literally, is that the reward for rejecting a sterile marriage is a pokey flat and a job in a department store. The entire gloomy terrain, as depicted, is of bored drunk housewives seeking validation via various forms of lifts (facial or otherwise), in order to attract inattentive spouses who are likely having affairs. And if the preceding isn’t the case, they (the women) are serial adulterers. Making a career of being the bit on the side. You rather wish Brooks had made a stupefied, aging-hipster flick, with Mary dropping acid in the Bahamas before bumping into Bobby Darin as an Italian gigolo.

Harry: One thing you’ve got and that’s class.
Mary: You should know. You’ve pinched every acre of it.

Oh wait, that last bit happened. The Bobby Darin bit. Although, he’s only putting on the accent. Also showing up is Lloyd Bridges, looking like he picked a bad week to remain uncommitted. And Dick Shawn as Fred’s associate Harry, a very different part to the one he played in It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (“I'm coming, momma!”) Nanette Fabray is the maid offering booze and advice (“Honey, all us girls over 35 got the same trouble”), while Teresa Wright is mum (despite being only eleven years older than Simmons). Mary’s belief that her mother and father had an idyllic marriage (“a game we played for your benefit”) appears to be grist to her living in a romantic bubble, one rudely burst but then buoyed up by booze.

One might argue The Happy Ending is a more reflective movie of its era than all those love-gen flicks that had nothing to do with how the majority lived, but Brooks – Simmons’ hubby until 1980 – was pushing sixty when he made it, and may not have been the ideal chronicler of the prevailing mood (Simmons, meanwhile, likely went along with him as the dutiful wife, hopefully minus the booze). If asked to place The Happy Ending, sight unseen, you’d be forgiven for assuming it was made near the other end of the decade.

Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

I’m just the balloon man.

Copshop (2021) (SPOILERS) A consistent problem with Joe Carnahan’s oeuvre is that, no matter how confidently his movies begin, or how strong his premise, or how adept his direction or compelling the performances he extracts, he ends up blowing it. He blows it with Copshop , a ’70s-inspired variant on Assault on Precinct 13 that is pretty damn good during the first hour, before devolving into his standard mode of sado-nihilistic mayhem.

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

When we have been subtle, then can I kill him?

The Avengers 6.16. Legacy of Death There’s scarcely any crediting the Terry Nation of Noon-Doomsday as the same Terry Nation that wrote this, let alone the Terry Nation churning out a no-frills Dalek story a season for the latter stages of the Jon Pertwee era. Of course, Nation had started out as a comedy writer (for Hancock), and it may be that the kick Brian Clemens gave him up the pants in reaction to the quality of Noon-Doomsday loosened a whole load of gags. Admittedly, a lot of them are well worn, but they come so thick and fast in Legacy of Death , accompanied by an assuredly giddy pace from director Don Chaffey (of Ray Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts ) and a fine ensemble of supporting players, that it would be churlish to complain.

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi