Skip to main content

It's like cycling with an elephant on your back.

Il Postino 
aka The Postman
(1995)

(SPOILERS) Il Postino’s success represented a triumph of marketing over substance. As one might have expected from the then-nascent Miramax, whose heft in that sphere had led to the likes of Sex, Lies and Videotape, My Left Foot, The Crying Game, Enchanted April, The Piano, Heavenly Creatures and – obviously – Pulp Fiction making a greater or lesser impact at both the box office and on the Oscars ceremony. Theirs was a battle strategy that would often have dubious relationship with actual merit. So what was new? Probably not a lot – while some of their favoured Academy contenders were deeply average, none were Dr. Dolittle – but it was more acute. And in Il Postino’s case (and later Life is Beautiful’s), it was attached to considerable sentimental massaging of Academy members’ sympathies and the “wowsa” of a (still relatively rare) Best Picture nomination for a foreign-language film.

Because Il Postino is the slightest of slight movies, one that would hardly merit a second glance were it not for the Weinsteins seizing on it as an unlikely awards darling. Although directed and co-scripted by Michael Radford (Nineteen Eighty-Four, White Mischief), the movie is really all about star Massimo Troisi. Troisi was suffering a serious heart condition throughout filming; much of his screen performance was via a stand-in, and he was only able to work for up to an hour a day. He died (at 41) a day after filming was completed. This, of course, was “gold, Jerry!” for someone like Harvey, who pounced on the opportunity to milk the actor’s demise for all it was worth.

Troisi co-wrote the screenplay (with Radford, Anna Pavignano, and Furio & Giacomo Scarpelli), based on Antonio Skàrmenta’s Ardienta paciencia, in turn adapted from his 1983 movie. It concerns Chilean poet Pablo Neruda (Phillipe Noiret) and his relationship with simple-minded postie Mario Ruoppolo (Troisi), the latter employed solely to deliver the former’s mail on the Italian island of Neruda’s exile. Inhaling the aura of greatness, Mario soon fancies himself as a poet, one particularly partial to metaphors, which comes in handy when wooing local café employee Beatrice (Maria Grazia Cucinotta). Neruda, a commie, has an enormous female fan base, so he obligingly offers Mario tips (Mario also appropriates most of his passionate verse from Neruda). Also in the gently bubbling brew are Beatrice’s disapproving aunt (Linda Moretti), who believes Mario is sex-crazed, and the election promises of local politician Di Cosimo (Mariano Rigillo).

Radford’s approach is one of softly-softly amiability, armed with a dimwit making good as he is mentored by a master, against the backdrop of a beatifically unhurried and nostalgic setting. Il Postino is wafer-thin, and with the best will in the world, Troisi’s performance (Weinstein secured him a Best Actor nomination) is something of an empty canvas. Noiret is fine, but he isn’t exactly being stretched (Moretti and Renato Scarpa’s telegrapher have much more to dig into). That Mario should eventually be killed in a communist demonstration – leaving wife Beatrice and son Pablito – seems almost an afterthought in terms of the political content, unless it’s to suggest the uncomprehending masses who never really understand what it is they’re following until it’s too late (Mario was attending to recite a poem composed in Neruda’s honour; his one prior fumbled attempt at political discourse led to a reprimand from a local fisherman who lost his sale).

Raffaele Lampugnani, in The Superfluous and the Missing Metaphor in Il Postino, believed the movie was missing something of the original, due to the transposition from a different culture (Chilean) and period (1970s to 1950s), Whereby: “The protagonist’s gathering of consciousness of his worth as a man and as a member of society is augmented by the gathering of political consciousness and the euphoria of social emancipation and participation in Allende’s Socialist alliance’s rise to government. This euphoria and hope for the future is brought to a tragic climax for both with the reactionary military coup, the destruction of the democratically elected Socialist government, repression, murder and the extinction of ideals”.

So there. Radford himself admitted of Di Cosmio’s political machinations: “This is part of a sub-plot which got much, much reduced. I don’t even know if it’s intelligible now”. In its undemanding way, the picture fosters wry observations and pithy lines. “You think so?” replies oblivious Mario when Neruda observes “This place is beautiful”. But Mario comprehends so little, it’s a little like accompanying an unfunny Clouseau around (Benigni, with whom Troisi once co-starred, would have been a duck to water in the role). “When it comes to sleeping with someone, there’s no difference between a poet, a priest or even a communist” we are informed (to emphasise the point, we are later earnestly informed “In Russia, the communists eat babies”). When Donna Rosa goes to complain about Mario to Neruda, she’s a veritable fount of metaphors, rather putting the would-be poet’s aspirations in perspective. But the movie is too languorous to ever have much bite, and insufficiently charming to allow one to luxuriate in its gentleness.

As for Oscar, Best Pick (John Dorney, Jessica Regan, Tom Salinsky) tells it that Miramax, in addition to the usual screeners and soundtrack CDs – hence the solitary Oscar – offered poetry recitals (not perhaps such a treat, since some of those reciting included Madonna, Sting and Wesley Snipes). They also vocally blamed Italy for passing the picture by on the grounds of national pride and exclusivity (by this point, it was no longer eligible, because Italy put The Star Maker forward the year before). While it’s moot whether Radford was a factor, the mere notion was catnip to Harvey: “Italy didn’t nominate ‘Postino’ because the director, Michael Radford, is English”. This was fuel to a doubtless embroidered spiel: “People told us they wanted to vote for the movie for best foreign film” professed Marcy Granata, then executive vice president of marketing and publicity for Miramax. “One purpose of the campaign is to tell them they can’t.” (Allisa Peren in Indie, Inc. appeared to garble the story, suggesting it “was ruled ineligible for a Best Foreign Film nomination because, according to the Academy’s criteria, it was not considered ‘Italian’ since an Englishman, Michael Radford, directed it”).

A piece in the aftermath of the Shakespeare in Love controversy (a vastly superior film to Saving Private Ryan) suggested “While I believe Oscar nominations can be won through campaigns — you've proved that as well as anyone with the nominations you collected for such ordinary fare as "Il Postino" and "Good Will Hunting" — I don't think you can buy the Oscar itself”. I’d argue nothing should be ruled out, and I’m certainly doubtful Il Postino’s sole statuette would have made it through without those CDs. Il Postino’s campaign would pay further dividends for Miramax a few years later with Life is Beautiful. That the former has been all but forgotten while the latter – love it or hate it – is etched on the memory, testifies to five nominations only sentiment could buy.


Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

I’m just the balloon man.

Copshop (2021) (SPOILERS) A consistent problem with Joe Carnahan’s oeuvre is that, no matter how confidently his movies begin, or how strong his premise, or how adept his direction or compelling the performances he extracts, he ends up blowing it. He blows it with Copshop , a ’70s-inspired variant on Assault on Precinct 13 that is pretty damn good during the first hour, before devolving into his standard mode of sado-nihilistic mayhem.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

When we have been subtle, then can I kill him?

The Avengers 6.16. Legacy of Death There’s scarcely any crediting the Terry Nation of Noon-Doomsday as the same Terry Nation that wrote this, let alone the Terry Nation churning out a no-frills Dalek story a season for the latter stages of the Jon Pertwee era. Of course, Nation had started out as a comedy writer (for Hancock), and it may be that the kick Brian Clemens gave him up the pants in reaction to the quality of Noon-Doomsday loosened a whole load of gags. Admittedly, a lot of them are well worn, but they come so thick and fast in Legacy of Death , accompanied by an assuredly giddy pace from director Don Chaffey (of Ray Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts ) and a fine ensemble of supporting players, that it would be churlish to complain.

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi