Skip to main content

There are some places which, to an Englishman, are sacred.

The Italian Job
(1969)

(SPOILERS) Has The Italian Job been forever sullied by its association with/ appropriation by Loaded/ lad culture/ Top Gear et al? I don’t think so. It was a bank holiday and family favourite long before being “rejuvenated” as an emblem of Cool Britannia and shallow self-regard. Indeed, the most striking part of the picture is how custom packaged it is from the first. There’s an easy confidence to Peter Collinson’s film, whereby it knows exactly what it wants to be and how to deliver that. Plus, it’s propelled by a supremely catchy, “footie anthem” theme song: Getta Bloomin’ Move On! (The Self Preservation Society).

There’s also the ending. One of the very best endings in movie history, flourishing a “Now get out of that”, literal cliffhanger which, without the “can do” confidence of Michael Caine’s Charlie Croker would leave you thinking – rather like the same year’s Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and its freeze frame – there was no way out for out (anti-) heroes. But Charlie’s “Hang on a minute, lads. I’ve got a great idea” followed by a slightly less reassuring “Err… Err…” is enough to instil a belief that he will somehow make good on this. And even if he doesn’t, he’ll live to pull off another job.

I’ve discussed that ending with others who still find it a bit of a bummer, wishing they’d made a clean break; they should have got away in a manner earlier movie tradition would have prevented – criminals cannot be rewarded or escape scot free – yet would have been relatively innocuous in the year of Easy Rider. My recollection is that, on first seeing the movie as a youngster, I too felt that way. Now, it simply seems like the perfect capper. Although, legend has it there were four different written endings, and producer Michael Deeley – later of The Deer Hunter and Blade Runner – came up with the final one. And it would have led into a sequel. If so, I’m glad a follow-up didn’t happen, simply because they’re rarely able to bottle whatever it was (the idea of a sequel seriesset to revolve around Corker’s grandchildren, who inherit his old safety deposit box, and a quest to find the Italian bullion is reignited” sounds absolutely appalling, if not to say abhorrent. But inevitable. If they must do it, get Guy Ritchie involved).

You couldn’t really characterise The Italian Job as feeding into the burst bubble of shattered dreams, the pervasive comedown characterising the year of Manson and found in the likes of Easy Rider, The Wild Bunch, Midnight Cowboy and Butch and Sundance’s nostalgic reverie. If you want a yardstick, it more closely resembles The Love Bug. However, one might see the ending, rather like the uncharacteristically bleak On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, putting a dampener on ’60s sky’s-the-limit thinking. In which case, it’s as if no one told the makers they should have been putting the brakes on the optimism until the last moment.

The Italian Job is, after all, the ultimate movie as a lark. Being in prison is a lark, as its inmates showing due respect to queen and country; patriotism is itself an upbeat lark. It’s about as knowing as movie get without breaking the fourth wall, playing with Rule Britannia iconography in a manner that truly beckoned no re-embrace in the ’90s. There’s nationalism at play and casual xenophobia, but it’s self-aware, conscious it’s all a game and so deserves to be treated cartoonishly, be that Bridger’s etiquette, the use of the Union Jack, the colour-coded minis or the EM-scrambling portly footie fan (“Bloody foreigners”).

Accordingly, it also displays Caine, in the first clear example of himself as a brand (well okay, maybe Billon Dollar Brain’s titles win that one). This was his last “young Michael” role (see also The Ipcress File, Alfie), where he’s confident, ready-quipped, unflappable and hip to the scene. Two years later, he’d startle as reptile-eyed Carter and from thence cash-grab oblivion (okay, not quite, but let’s just call him indiscriminate in his choices).

He’s one of the key comperes of this event, his breezily casual manner informing us how we should treat the job every bit as much as Quincy Jones’s superb scoring and Peter Collinson’s expert execution. Troy Kennedy Martin’s screenplay helps, of course (and its cocky confidence illustrates his versatility, when compared to his later TV masterpiece Edge of Darkness). Douglas Slocombe’s photography is appropriately poppy and colourful. It’s Collinson’s work, though, that always makes me wonder.

Rather like Peter R Hunt, who graduated from Bond editor to director with On Her Majesty’s Secret Service and made one of the few early entries in the series that stands the test of time stylistically, Collinson subsequently made little of merit. Indeed, he directed eleven movies over the following decade (he died in 1980 at the age of only 44) and none of them are held in any kind of regard. The only one I know well is the And Then There Were None remake (which I like, but many don’t). Along the way, he incurred the enmity of Tony Curtis, who knows a thing or two about bad movies.

But Collinson’s acumen in The Italian Job is never in question. The proceedings are infectiously upbeat and pacy. Perhaps its larger-than-life comic strip was better suited to his temperament than the genres he would later plumb. In concert with editor John Trumper (who worked on prior Collinson pictures and later on Get Carter), the picture carries an almost musical rhythm and assuredness, long before The Self Preservation Society kicks in, false-triumphantly, at 85 minutes and takes us through to the ending (the shots of the minis in the sewer to Quincy’s accompaniment are sublime). Everything has a perfect rhythm: Croker must persuade Mr Bridger of the wisdom of his plan, then train for the job (of which, the most famous line), then put it into effect (cue some delirious stunt work and a mosaic of editing filled with cheeky thrills).

As noted, the movie’s materialist glee – it’s all objects, objectives and objectifying, be it cars, money, girls, even football, and cheerfully unabashed with it – made it ripe for superficial rediscovery in the ’90s under the auspices of Cool Britannia. But, as also noted, it’s the self-awareness that makes it a keeper. Ailing Noël Coward as Mr Bridger is both iconically Noël Coward and a parody/celebration of absurd patriotic spirit and national pride (you can have your cake and eat it with a staunchly royalist criminal emphasising the wheels of control). Martin had wanted Nicol Williamson as a harder nut, which… well, I guess it’s all relative.

Caine, of course, is pure Caine, at his most effortlessly charming and charismatic. It’s probably the closest he comes to a caricature of his perceived persona, and he entirely inhabits and informs the picture’s tone. Is there a more perfect scene here than the one where he and Camp Freddie (Tony Beckley, peerless, and later of Get Carter and Doctor Who’s The Seeds of Doom) visit Miss Peach (Irene Handl) – and her complement of cats – and she tells them of “Something quite obscene” her son Professor Simon Peach (Benny Hill) did with Annette? The timing, reactions, delivery are all beautifully done. It's a relatively small sacrifice that he's also responsible for one of the most (badly) mimicked lines in movie history. Possibly the most (badly) mimicked in the British Isles.

Hill is very naughty, of course. There are also appearances from the likes of Simon Dee, Robert Powell, John Le Mesurier. Caine creates instant rapport with the various crew members (including Michael Standing and George Innes). It’s an equal-status enterprise, whereby the posh drivers are reluctantly allowed to partake by the good working-class criminals. The curiosity is how incidental girlfriend Lorna is (Maggie Blye), introducing Charlie to a harem and getting angry at him, but making little impression other than through fashionably era-conscious dress sense.

Success? If you look at the Wiki page of top-grossing movies of the year, you’ll see The Italian Job at seven, but given the movie was cited as a miss by Caine (due to advertising) and ranked only fourteenth for the year in the UK, that seems like revisionism, after-the-fact wishful thinking. It can be fairly definitively argued, however, that The Italian Job is one of the many movies whose reputation steadily gathered lustre through rewatch value, rather than necessarily having instant classic cachet. The remake, in contrast, did very well for itself, but no one mentions it nearly two decades later. But then, Marky Mark is no Michael Caine.



Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

I’m just the balloon man.

Copshop (2021) (SPOILERS) A consistent problem with Joe Carnahan’s oeuvre is that, no matter how confidently his movies begin, or how strong his premise, or how adept his direction or compelling the performances he extracts, he ends up blowing it. He blows it with Copshop , a ’70s-inspired variant on Assault on Precinct 13 that is pretty damn good during the first hour, before devolving into his standard mode of sado-nihilistic mayhem.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

When we have been subtle, then can I kill him?

The Avengers 6.16. Legacy of Death There’s scarcely any crediting the Terry Nation of Noon-Doomsday as the same Terry Nation that wrote this, let alone the Terry Nation churning out a no-frills Dalek story a season for the latter stages of the Jon Pertwee era. Of course, Nation had started out as a comedy writer (for Hancock), and it may be that the kick Brian Clemens gave him up the pants in reaction to the quality of Noon-Doomsday loosened a whole load of gags. Admittedly, a lot of them are well worn, but they come so thick and fast in Legacy of Death , accompanied by an assuredly giddy pace from director Don Chaffey (of Ray Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts ) and a fine ensemble of supporting players, that it would be churlish to complain.

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi