Skip to main content

Basically, I take human garbage from around the world, and I reprocess it.

No Escape
(1994)

(SPOILERS) A problem for the futuristic prison movie subgenre is that its instigators can be a little slack when it comes to including an idea of how the encompassing future world operates. A corporatised prison system seems like a given (see also Wedlock, Fortress), probably because it already had roots when these movies came out (in the US, UK, France and Oz, at minimum). Beyond that, though, the unifying factor is an apparent lack of thought. No Escape, a mish-mash of established tropes, some utilised effectively by director Martin Campbell, some less so, exemplifies this.

Title: In the year 2022, the international prison system is operated by private corporations. Criminals from all over the world are exploited at a profit. Prisons have become a big business.

The opening title might be seen to suggest a one-world government for its “now”, or moves in that direction, since the prison system knows no borders. We never hear anything to confirm or deny, but it’s implicit that, despite the reach of corporations, they aren’t calling the ultimate shots (it doesn’t appear this is a functional Guantanamo, and there’s no Tom Hanks, or his mortal remains, in sight). Rather endearingly, No Escape is one of those “bad apples” movies Hollywood prefers, where order can be “restored”, if only our heroes alert the public and/or the essentially decent authorities. While this kind of scenario is understandable when it comes to contemporary fare (Enemy of the State, say, which was explicitly changed in order to suggest a few bad eggs operating the surveillance state) it’s discouraging when SF, not so much a genre to bottle it when it comes to dystopian fantasies, should opt for a similar course. Unless, that is, the dystopian horrors of the actual 2022 also conceal a silver lining…

Warden: I run a multinational business here, Mr Robbins. Basically, I take human garbage from around the world, and I reprocess it.

So our hero John Robbins (Ray Liotta) is sentenced to Leviticus Level 6 Maximum Security Prison, having previously escaped two different Level 5 prisons. He’s given the standard lecture by Michael Lerner’s’ de rigueur nightmare warden (“Society has no further use for you… death is the only way out… no chance of reprieve, no possibility of escape, you are condemned”). Leviticus is a bleak, hermetically-sealed facility, but through failing to do as the warden instructs (kill a fellow prisoner), John is sentenced to… the fresh air, clean water and teeming flora of Absolom island, 200 miles off the mainland!

Sure, it’s under constant surveillance, via high-resolution optics, infra-red scans and a fleet of gunships fifty miles out, but it beats a lightless cell, right? Is this the future of a progressive prison system? Well, if you’re able to fall in with the Insiders, led by the Father (Lance Henriksen), yes. If not, and you’re one of the Outsiders, under the rule of Marek (Stuart Wilson), you’re shit out of luck. And will, quite possibly, also end up as lunch. They not only look like Mad Max rejects by way of Lord of the Flies meets Apocalypse Now, they practice cannibalism when they aren’t eating rats. They also outnumber the Insiders and their fragile, civilised village and bespoke knitwear by 600 to 98.

Hawkins: This place is secret. It’s private.

Michael Gaylin and Joel Gross’s screenplay is loosely based on Richard Herley’s 1987 novel The Penal Colony (set on an island off the Cornish coast – this was filmed in Queensland). Not much of a title, but still better than the utterly redundant No Escape (if you want a flop movie, a good start is giving it a title that actively encourages public disinterest; French title Absolom 2022 is a tad better). I don’t know how that the novel turned out, but it surely has to be more satisfying than this. Did Gale Anne Hurd – who previously worked with Campbell on HBO Lovecraftian detective noir Cast a Deadly Spell – and co decide to graft some positive developments onto its dystopian jungle?

About two-thirds of the way through, we’re told the prison authorities keep Absolom classified, as the public wouldn’t allow it if truth leaked out. What part wouldn’t they allow, exactly? Were this the actual 2022, Absolom would surely be linked up to a livestream, far from provoking public outrage, except perhaps from celebrities wondering why they can’t get into there. But no, Robbins, who failed to spread the truth (not least regarding the background to his incarceration) upon escaping several earlier facilities, is going to set the world to rights this time.

Robbins: We were losing the war. The brass needed a big body count. Even after I killed the old man, no one would listen to me.

Other elements are also left hanging. Rather than simply reading his file, the Warden has a DNA scan performed on Robbins. This reveals “near pathological aversion to authority and a temperament prone to violent behaviour”; it’s comforting to know one’s DNA contains such profound insights. We also learn Robbins’ history; one of the most effective parts of the movie is actually the opening credits, showing a parade ground in long shot silhouette. The attention is only broken at the end of the credits, as a figure breaks with the parade and shoots his CO in the head. This was Robbins, a Special Forces marine who was court-martialled in 2011. We learn his act was a reprisal for being ordered into a situation where he and his men killed 342 women and children on the pretext of bioweapons (hmmm, mass murder committed in the Middle East on the basis of a lie about WMDs?) Curiously, this conflict took place in Benghazi; the actual 2011 saw Gaddafi ousted as part of the CIA’s Arab Spring operation.

No Escape landed at a time when Hollywood was still flirting with the possibility Liotta might establish himself as leading man – like Alec Baldwin, they concluded, somewhere around ’96, that this was simply a non-starter. Still, he’s well cast as a no-nonsense killing machine, only annoying slightly when he overdoes “pain” acting. He’s certainly more than capable of carrying a big movie; the problem with No Escape is that, while Campbell directs it more than serviceably – even if many of the miniature model shots have all the conviction of miniature model shots – it has a hankering to be more respectable than its essentially pulpy basic allow (witness the over-earnest Graeme Revell score). So unlike Fortress, it over-extends itself to two hours, incorporating numerous, increasingly tiresome conversations about lone wolfism vs responsibility to the group.

Marek: That’s extraordinary. It’s not exactly what we had in mind, but, er, extraordinary.

Campbell has assembled a strong-enough cast, but they’re stuck with stock types. Good guy Father, preaching in a Jesus cassock, is boosted by Henriksen playing him, but he can only do so much. Wilson is kind of funny at times, particularly his initial reaction to Robbins dealing with his big challenger with a single knife blow, but Marek’s also rather silly, both in terms of costume, hair & makeup and impact; you don’t really believe he’s the threat he’s supposed to be. There’s solid additional support from the likes of Don Henderson, Ernie Hudson, Ian McNeice and Kevin Dillon.

Various mitigating clauses are offered the high-grade felons in the Insider camp. So Dillon’s Casey, involved in the Weinberger kidnapping, was just the gopher. Dysart (Jack Shepherd) wants to stay on the island out of guilt for making a deadly bomb. And Father, whom everyone believes is untouchable (“I think he’s the only innocent man here”) is seriously contrite (“My wife’s death was no suicide”). Henderson makes booze, so he’s alright. McNeice’s King, meanwhile, propounds the “virtues” of allopathic medicine; you’d have thought this would be a chance to break ranks with Rockefeller religion. Although, he does turn out to be a bad egg; the spy in their midst, so perhaps the two are related. Of which, you wouldn’t have the only gay character – unless we include Casey crushing on Robbins – revealed as a no-good stinker in an actual 2022 movie.

When it comes to the action, No Escape delivers; the early passage, of Robbins navigating Outsiders territory before he escapes to the Insiders, is taut and gripping. Unfortunately, there’s too much fat elsewhere. Campbell would later note that, while the film made no money, it led to United Artists’ John Calley calling him (“… he said, ‘Do you want direct Bond?’ I said, ‘Why did you choose me?’ And he said, ‘Well, I saw No Escape and I think you’d be good for it’—probably because I was cheap”).

No Escape includes a Christmas scene, one of those bad Christmas movie moments, as it heralds the attack on the Outsider compound and Marek singing carols. It’s extraordinary just how much flotsam and jetsam from industrialised society has washed up on the island that the Insiders are able to put to use. Added to which, I’m assuming that, whatever else is withheld from them in supply drops, the Insiders are still allowed provisions of wool, fabric and knitting needles.

Hawkins: Robbins, do you believe there’s a God out there, looking out for us?
Robbins: There’s somebody out there. It sure as hell isn’t God.

The conversation about God is notable; Robbins gives a typical Hollywood tough guy disavowal, and Campbell and editor Terry Rawlings promptly cut to who IS out there, a satellite orbiting globe Earth, reinforcing the idea that we are being watched just the way they want you to think we are being watched (see Enemy of the State for further fuel to that fire). Campbell said of No Escapeit really served its purpose” on the grounds it got him Goldeneye, which is fair enough, but it would have been better served had it been trimmed by half an hour.




Popular posts from this blog

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.