Skip to main content

I felt he used too many onions, but it was still a very good sauce.

Goodfellas
(1990)

(SPOILERS) Scorsese’s gangsters-at-street-level masterpiece is near the top of most lists for “It wuz robbed” when looking back at Best Picture Oscar winners. Kev’s Dances with Wolves is a decent-enough movie and a decent-ish revisionist western, put together with care, craft and what appears to be genuine feeling on its maker’s part; there are certainly far worse Best Picture winners out there. But co-contender Goodfellas is in a class all its own. It also reminds the viewer that, in the first rank of filmmakers as Scorsese is, it’s become relatively rare for him to tackle material with which he visibly (and palpably) connects.

Even when he’s operating in what might be called a familiar milieu – be it Italian-American environs or religious ones – there’s often something vital missing. You can see this in the triptych of The Last Temptation of Christ, Kundun and Silence, where Scorsese is only able to tackle faith – unsurprisingly given his lens is through the most materialist of Christian denominations, Roman Catholicism, with all its totems, effigies and rites – in a literal way, even or especially when it comes to spiritual ramifications. The “daring” temptation sequence and the Dalai Lama’s visions are meticulously designed, but any power in those sequences derives from the soundtrack’s emotional import (Gabriel and Glass respectively) rather than the director’s shock and awe.

Which is why Goodfellas is ideal for the director, and so was The Wolf of Wall Street, offering the perfect medley of attraction and repulsion, temptation and rejection. These worlds need to be appealing – they are, in the broadest sense of the word, entirely carnal, as is Scorsese, in the broadest sense of the word – if they’re going to put us off them. In Goodfellas case, the surfeit of vicious stabbings, shootings, paranoia and posturing may ensure few watching want to be an actual gangster, but many nevertheless embrace the idea of their lifestyle (just ask Jon Favreau per Swingers), such that it has become the touchstone for the gangster movie and in The Sopranos’ case, TV’s too (well, aside from those who prefer Scarface’s Jacobean rock opera).

Nevertheless, there’s clearly an alchemy to be had with Scorsese that’s often elusive. You can see it in Taxi Driver and After Hours, but it’s absent from The Departed – entertaining as that picture often is – and the more so from The Irishman. Even with Casino, hugely proficient as the picture is, there’s something’s not quite there. None of which is to suggest other than it being impressive for a director to reach the number of entirely on-target pictures Scorsese has. That, and to score a bullseye, they need to reflect their own sensibilities in some way, shape or form (a reason Spielberg, once he forsook his aptitude for flights of fantasy, became mostly a glorified technician, forever chasing peer praise and kudos. We can see something not dissimilar in much of Scorsese’s work of the last thirty years).

I mentioned The Irishman, and if there’s one unfavourable shadow that geriatric attempt at gangsterism casts on Goodfellas, it’s age-appropriate casting. This is a movie that not only expects us to treat Joe Pesci and Ray Liotta as contemporaries – we never do – but also wants us to believe in Pesci playing a guy in his twenties. We can swallow Pesci and De Niro as wiseguys in the same age bracket (because they are), so it’s a stretch enough to have the latter playing Jimmy Conway at thirty (De Niro was 45 when the movie was made). The disparities in no way interfere with overall enjoyment of Goodfellas – unlike De Niro, “playing” someone thirty years younger, moving like a septuagenarian while kicking a guy into the curb in The Irishman – but there’s a lingering dissonance. Even Liotta – RIP – was only the age of the actual Hill at the end of the picture (1980-ish). The actual Tommy was seven years younger than Hill, and “disappeared” at 28. So really, Pesci was playing, at the character’s most mature, someone under thirty.

Pesci gets all the plaudits, of course, and he won the picture’s solitary Oscar. It’s a monster of a performance, the gold standard for unpredictable, unnerving, randomly motivated movie violence (okay, possibly shared with Ben Kingsley in Sexy Beast). But also very funny (how? Check out the scene with Marty’s mom and the painting, not just the “Funny how?”).

It’s Liotta who always impresses me the most in Goodfellas, though. It’s notable Scorsese never worked with him again – I saw it suggested he was offered the Mark Wahlberg role in The Departed but couldn’t take it due to scheduling conflicts – because the picture lives or dies on his performance. His readings of the insistent narration are crucial, guiding and weaving us through the gangster realm. Liotta was previously best known for portraying a psycho – actually, I say best known, I should say best regarded, as more people would have seen him in Field of Dreams than Something Wild – and brings to the party a certain wildness of the eyes and danger in the mouth.

But he turns that inward here, imbuing Henry Hill with a keen reserve, a wariness of his peers that serves as a push-pull. He’s enamoured of the lifestyle, but not big on the ultraviolence and abjectly unsettled by Pesci’s Tommy. Indeed, one might even suggest there’s something a little fishy, not in his performance but in Scorsese’s choice to show Henry’s reticence whenever someone is stabbed on shot; how could he possibly hang around such activity for so long without either displaying his own vicious mettle or becoming inured (admittedly, towards the end, Henry does make a point of noting, prior to his fateful decision to turn state’s witness, that Jimmy had never sent him on a hit before, suggesting that simply wasn’t his station)?

In a testosterone-drenched picture, Lorraine Bracco’s able to hold her own, mostly due to the wise decision to grant Karen her own narration; the movie is never in danger of becoming about Karen Hill, but neither is her role reduced to the forgettable wife part so common in such fare (in that sense, Goodfellas is likely taking its cues from Diane Keaton in The Godfathers, but succeeding in giving Karen more agency). It’s notable that both Liotta and Bracco’s parts remain something of career highs. Liotta never found a firm footing in leading man roles, while Bracco quickly stumbled opposite Sean Connery in Medicine Man; she would make more lasting impact on the small screen in The Sopranos: as noted, hugely indebted to Scorsese’s movie.

The other significant players are Paul Sorvino, unblinking steel behind the affable exterior, and De Niro, in what would become something of a career dividing line; Jimmy Conway pushed him towards elder, mentor status. Indeed, there’s a sense in Goodfellas that the character itself is part of the furniture and De Niro, good as he is, is also no more than solid (or stolid). His awards recognition that year was for a showy “actor” part, flourishing the disability schtick that worked so well for Hoffman two years earlier, and with Cape Fear the following year, you can see the move into roles that, if they were a challenge, were more definably in the populist realm.

It bears reiterating that you can feel Scorsese feels the material here, rather than simply embracing its technical challenges (as he would in much of his subsequent work that decade, however high-minded – The Age of Innocence, Kundun – or low – Cape Fear). The final half hour is a coke-fuelled tour de force of edge-of-the-seat, (cold) sweaty paranoia. The one-shot entrance to (the Copacabana) is rightly feted, but there’s also the manner of delivery, be it POV introducing the various faces as they acknowledge the camera, or Henry getting up from the courtroom and breaking the fourth wall, addressing us.

The musical accompaniment is a character in itself, acutely precise in driving or characterising a scene or sequence. At times – Atlantis by Donovan playing as Jimmy and Tommy kick, beat and stab Billy Batts (Frank Vincent) to death – is almost surreal in its sense of humour. The opening titles fly past, announcing the propulsive power of the picture itself, while the exit – to Sid Vicious singing My Way, as Henry faces life as an average “schnook” – couldn’t be more perfect (reflecting too the director’s “kind of really punk attitude” to the project).

Pauline Kael, nearing the end of her critic’s career, called Goodfellasa triumphant piece of filmmaking”, one boasting “such bravura that you respond as if you were at a live performance”. However, she stopped short of delivering a rapturous endorsement: “Is it a great movie? I don’t think so”. Obviously, the passage of time has proclaimed her wrong, but she also expressed concern at Henry’s “puzzled revulsion” at his peers’ violence (“Incidents like this… appear to be pointing toward an awakening sensibility in Henry, but nothing comes of them, so they seem perfunctory, a sop to conventionality”). Further, “he has been made to seem slightly cut off from the mob life… when he needs to be a rat and the motor of the movie”.

I don’t think the latter point is the case – clearly, the movie has motor enough – but there is a nagging sense that much of the mayhem and mutilation Henry sees should be water off a duck’s back (he’s only seen truly embracing beatings when it comes to Karen being victimised, which is ironic in itself, given Bracco’s characterisation of her part as an “abused wife”). Hill claimed on Howard Stern to have killed three people (ordered by Burke), or alternatively none at all, but he was also known as a “calm and silent observer rather than an aggressive responder”. Either way, his hesitancy in Goodfellas enables a degree of audience empathy, and Scorsese was perhaps mindful of this as an “in” (if he was, that’s in stark contrast to Raging Bull).

Co-screenwriter (with the director) Nicholas Pileggi wouldn’t strike as hot again, collaborating with Scorsese on Casino (and as producer on The Irishman) but floundering with City Hall and Vegas (that one on TV). He has a screenplay for Scarpa in the offing. Goodfellas was only a moderate success in its cinema run; notably, it was Scorsese’s most expensive movie to that point, making a little less than twice its cost (in the US). Of course, legacy value transforms that exponentially, but we’re looking at a picture that, come the awards season, had done the least business of the five Best Picture nominees. Receiving nods for Picture, Director, Pesci, Bracco, Adapted Screenplay and Editing, it should arguably have swept the board; it was the BAFTAs, far from the most reliable awards body, that got it right, handing Goodfellas Film, Director, Adapted Screenplay, Editing and Costume Design.


Popular posts from this blog

This risotto is shmackin’, dude.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 1 (SPOILERS) I haven’t had cause, or the urge, to revisit earlier seasons of Stranger Things , but I’m fairly certain my (relatively) positive takes on the first two sequel seasons would adjust down somewhat if I did (a Soviet base under Hawkins? DUMB soft disclosure or not, it’s pretty dumb). In my Season Three review, I called the show “ Netflix’s best-packaged junk food. It knows not to outstay its welcome, doesn’t cause bloat and is disposable in mostly good ways ” I fairly certain the Duffer’s weren’t reading, but it’s as if they decided, as a rebuke, that bloat was the only way to go for Season Four. Hence episodes approaching (or exceeding) twice the standard length. So while the other points – that it wouldn’t stray from its cosy identity and seasons tend to merge in the memory – hold fast, you can feel the ambition of an expansive canvas faltering at the hurdle of Stranger Things ’ essential, curated, nostalgia-appeal inconsequentiality.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Is this supposed to be me? It’s grotesque.

The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022) (SPOILERS) I didn’t hold out much hope for The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent being more than moderately tolerable. Not so much because its relatively untested director and his co-writer are mostly known in the TV sphere (and not so much for anything anyone is raving about). Although, it has to be admitted, the finished movie flourishes a degree of digital flatness typical of small-screen productions (it’s fine, but nothing more). Rather, due to the already over-tapped meta-strain of celebs showing they’re good sports about themselves. When Spike Jonze did it with John Malkovich, it was weird and different. By the time we had JCVD , not so much. And both of them are pre-dated by Arnie in Last Action Hero (“ You brought me nothing but pain ” he is told by Jack Slater). Plus, it isn’t as if Tom Gormican and Kevin Etten have much in the way of an angle on Nic; the movie’s basically there to glorify “him”, give or take a few foibles, do

All the world will be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies.

Watership Down (1978) (SPOILERS) I only read Watership Down recently, despite having loved the film from the first, and I was immediately impressed with how faithful, albeit inevitably compacted, Martin Rosen’s adaptation is. It manages to translate the lyrical, mythic and metaphysical qualities of Richard Adams’ novel without succumbing to dumbing down or the urge to cater for a broader or younger audience. It may be true that parents are the ones who get most concerned over the more disturbing elements of the picture but, given the maturity of the content, it remains a surprise that, as with 2001: A Space Odyssey (which may on the face of it seem like an odd bedfellow), this doesn’t garner a PG certificate. As the makers noted, Watership Down is at least in part an Exodus story, but the biblical implications extend beyond Hazel merely leading his fluffle to the titular promised land. There is a prevalent spiritual dimension to this rabbit universe, one very much

Whacking. I'm hell at whacking.

Witness (1985) (SPOILERS) Witness saw the advent of a relatively brief period – just over half a decade –during which Harrison Ford was willing to use his star power in an attempt to branch out. The results were mixed, and abruptly concluded when his typically too late to go where Daniel Day Lewis, Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro had gone before (with at bare minimum Oscar-nominated results) – but not “ full retard ” – ended in derision with Regarding Henry . He retreated to the world of Tom Clancy, and it’s the point where his cachet began to crumble. There had always been a stolid quality beneath even his more colourful characters, but now it came to the fore. You can see something of that as John Book in Witness – despite his sole Oscar nom, it might be one of Ford’s least interesting performances of the 80s – but it scarcely matters, or that the screenplay (which won) is by turns nostalgic, reactionary, wistful and formulaic, as director Peter Weir, in his Hollywood debu

The Illumi-what-i?

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness (2022) (SPOILERS) In which Sam Raimi proves that he can stand proudly with the best – or worst – of them as a good little foot soldier of the woke apocalypse. You’d expect the wilfully anarchic – and Republican – Raimi to choke on the woke, but instead, he’s sucked it up, grinned and bore it. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is so slavishly a production-line Marvel movie, both in plotting and character, and in nu-Feige progressive sensibilities, there was no chance of Sam staggering out from beneath its suffocating demands with anything more than a few scraps of stylistic flourish intact.

If that small woman is small enough, she could fit behind a small tree.

Stranger Things Season 4: Volume 2 (SPOILERS) I can’t quite find it within myself to perform the rapturous somersaults that seem to be the prevailing response to this fourth run of the show. I’ve outlined some of my thematic issues in the Volume 1 review, largely borne out here, but the greater concern is one I’ve held since Season Two began – and this is the best run since Season One, at least as far my failing memory can account for – and that’s the purpose-built formula dictated by the Duffer Brothers. It’s there in each new Big Bad, obviously, even to the extent that this is the Big-Bad-who-binds-them-all (except the Upside Down was always there, right?) And it’s there with the resurgent emotional beats, partings, reunions and plaintively stirring music cues. I have to be really on board with a movie or show to embrace such flagrantly shameless manipulation, season after season, and I find myself increasingly immune.

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948) (SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls… dyin’ time’s here!

Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome (1985) Time was kind to Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome . As in, it was such a long time since I’d seen the “final chapter” of the trilogy, it had dwindled in my memory to the status of an “alright but not great” sequel. I’d half-expected to have positive things to say along the lines of it being misunderstood, or being able to see what it was trying for but perhaps failing to quite achieve. Instead, I re-discovered a massive turkey that is really a Mad Max movie in name only (appropriately, since Max was an afterthought). This is the kind of picture fans of beloved series tend to loathe; when a favourite character returns but without the qualities or tone that made them adored in the first place (see Indiana Jones in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull , or John McClane in the last two Die Hard s). Thunderdome stinks even more than the methane fuelling Bartertown. I hadn’t been aware of the origins of Thunderdome until recently, mainly because I was