Skip to main content

My earth magic will stoke the flames of your sword.

The Northman
(2022)

(SPOILERS) Tarzan the Eric Northman. Robert Eggers’ “authentic” Viking flick is a pagan-chic melange of exploitation splatter and grisly characterisation, designed to impress upon us just how uncivilised things were back then. But also kind of great, right? Because people were freer and more instinctive and more aligned with the old gods. And shit. Eggers’ pictures, with their unhealthily heathen hues, appear to be an embrace/warning of the madness and ecstasy that comes with such release. Surely no right-minded person would wish to end up like Robert Pattison in The Lighthouse, nor Alexander Skarsgård here, even if they were granted the latter’s magic pecs in the bargain. It follows, then, that you don’t need to be a right-minded person to clutch his works to your shrivelled bosom. Hence The Church of Satan endorsing The Witch.

Amleth: For now, I will haunt this family like a hungry corpse returned from the dead.

Which is a pretty good movie. Although, as Jay Dyer notes, it’s less a vindication of the pagan way than a representation of “two versions of pagans” (the other being Calvinist Gnosticism). And again, if you’re enamoured of the kind of stuff that’s all in the average incantation of an Eggers witch, you’ve got serious problems of the sort Anton LaVey would probably happily nurture. Dyer’s of the view the promotion of nature-worship religions serves the green agenda, which it probably does, although these things are at best incremental, really. More of Eggers’ movies – perhaps appropriately, for someone hailing from NYC – deal with the horrors of nature than the beauty therein, but he’s evidently enervated by the nostalgic lure of periods in the misty past when we were more attuned to its antic ebbs and flows.

Whether Eggers’ much-vaunted application of “historical” detail is a hiding to nothing is debatable, however. A lot of time spent ensuring the stitching is perfect on period wear that relates to an Old Norse poem that doesn’t exist and may have been, if it did, set circa 10th century. Even assuming the details are right, a tale beginning in AD 895 would be variably – depending on where you’re counting from – more like the equivalent of 1900? Or 105 BC? Factoring in a potential thousand years of invented time. Generally, Eggers lore encourages the fostering of a pre-civilised appreciation of the world, per – ironically, given his whole pagan bit – current scientific-historical cannon. The possibility that this design is masking what may, hitherto, have been golden or enlightened ages wouldn’t occur to him.

Amleth: It’s a nightmare.
Olga: Then you might wake up.
Amleth: It’s a nightmare for them.

But let’s not kid ourselves about Eggers’ relative trueness to his vision either. He’s said there were studio struggles involved in the production, so perhaps he was against Alexander’s Hollywood AD waxed pecs and such dialogue as the above (you can type this shit, Rupert…) Given the standard lifestyle options, where you’re likely to be the victim of indiscriminate peasant-murdering as target practice while you’re out fishing, everyone alive in this age is inevitably permanently traumatised, or psychotic, or both.

Except for the ones who somehow have a sufficiently modern sensibility (or sensitivity) as Amleth (Alex) and Olga of the Birch Forest (Anya Taylor-Joy). They’re fully equipped and prepared mentally to enact a carefully strategised assault, whereby all their victims believe sorcery is afoot (Olga from the Volga is a sorceress, a Slavic one at that, but the reason everyone’s struck with terror is down to her rather prosaically spiking their broth with magic mushrooms and Amleth making an ornate ritual frieze from some victims’ remains).

Queen Gudrún: In the end, you’re just like your father. Evil begets evil.

The Northman, Eggers’ take on Hamlet – he’d doubtless argue Hamlet is Shakespeare’s take on Amleth; whether we’d have a Northman without Shakey’s popularisation is questionable, though – is more successful and coherent than Justin Kurzel’s also-bloodthirsty Macbeth a few years back, but its similarly broken down to its bare essentials. In this case, though, having broken it down, Eggers proceeds to build it back up again, not with plot and character, but mood and mud and blood. The Lighthouse, for all its faults, at least carried a lack of certainty – at first, at any rate – over quite where it was heading. You know from the outset this is a revenger, so everything else is period couture. Which means blood, sweat, bawdry, hurly burly and primitivism.

There’s a high old time here, then, of rapin’ and murderin’ and pillagin’ and cuttin’ off noses. Along with much babbling, grunting and oath making. At times, it’s a bit like watching Gilliam’s Life of Brian jailer for two-and-a-half hours, particularly when Willem Dafoe’s fart-crazed wise-fool shaman is on the scene (which admittedly, isn’t for long). Björk pops up as the Icelandic equivalent of the Swedish chef, but at least her accent isn’t the Nordic equivalent of Dick Van Dyke (towards which some of them here drift here).

Along the way, Almeth embarks on vision quests and actual fantasy quests; whether we’re supposed to ascribe literalism – and authenticity, presumably – to his encounter with the zombie Mound Dweller (Ian Whyte), I don’t know; the general tone of stricken, supernatural foreboding suggests it makes little difference either way, what with incessantly oppressive weather (those elements – they sure are bastards!) and a soundtrack of constipated choral fatigue.

Queen Gudrún: Your sword is long.

Eventually, Almeth, who fled the island of Hrafnsey as a youngster, back when he looked a wee bit like Milla Jovovich, returns as a pectorally-afflicted slave to his uncle Fjölnir (Claes Bang). Who murdered Almeth’s father – and Fjolnir’s brother – King Aurvandill War Raven (Ethan Hawke looks like as desiccated as Sean Harris but significantly less terrifying). And wedded his mother Queen Gudrún (Nicole Kidman). Protracted labour, suffering, revenge and confrontation follow.

Amleth: It’s not my time. I will die in battle.

Every so often, Eggers lobs something into the mix that catches one’s attention – and I don’t just mean disembowelling or running a noseless man through his noselessness with a sword. Dafoe’s Heimir leads young Almeth and dad on a ceremonial trip where they go full feral and bark like dogs. Angry Amleth headbutts an opposing player (Hafþór Július Björnsson) to death on football pitch, in clear homage to Escape to Victory. Wicked mumsie, on reuniting with Almeth, first goes all incest-happy, before admitting her complicity in Aurvandill’s murder and his attempted murder; when they next meet, she has a good stab at killing him. Kidman’s extremely convincing as a horrible, heartless harridan, doubtless from direct experience. Finally, Fjölnir, a tad upset that wifey and son Gunnnar (Elliot Rose) have been slain, announces “I will meet you at the gates of Hel!” and it isn’t long before they’re confronting each other in their starkers amid some lava flows. Much like Obi-Wan, Amleth has the higher ground, on account of Alex being about 6’4”, and lops Fjölnir’s head off, before obligingly expiring himself, off to Valhalla on his Norse horse.

Olga: There is now a living thread that binds us.

This isn’t a movie where you take away much in performance terms. Skarsgård is there to flex and gurn; he may as well be Arnie for all the dramatic import he carries. Gustav Lindh (Riders of Justice) is an effective little shit as Fjölnir’s elder son (he’s the one who ends up literally heartless). I wasn’t at all sure about Taylor-Joy’s accent, but hey, I’m sure its flawless. As I suggested above, the impulse behind this kind of pagan plundering strikes me as rather false, designed to imbue upon us the idea that, deep down, we are all essentially savages of relative and inconsequential moral mettle. To which end, someone somewhere will demand and devour, with entrails, a four-hour cut of The Northman, per Midsommar. Hopefully it will include all the outtakes where Alex bumps his noggin on the door frame every time he enters or leaves a room.


Popular posts from this blog

If I do nothing else, I will convince them that Herbert Stempel knows what won the goddam Academy Award for Best goddam Picture of 1955. That’s what I’m going to accomplish.

Quiz Show (1994) (SPOILERS) Quiz Show perfectly encapsulates a certain brand of Best Picture nominee: the staid, respectable, diligent historical episode, a morality tale in response to which the Academy can nod their heads approvingly and discerningly, feeding as it does their own vainglorious self-image about how times and attitudes have changed, in part thanks to their own virtuousness. Robert Redford’s film about the 1950s Twenty-One quiz show scandals is immaculately made, boasts a notable cast and is guided by a strong screenplay from Paul Attanasio (who, on television, had just created the seminal Homicide: Life on the Streets ), but it lacks that something extra that pushes it into truly memorable territory.

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.

Piece by piece, the camel enters the couscous.

The Forgiven (2021) (SPOILERS) By this point, the differences between filmmaker John Michael McDonagh and his younger brother, filmmaker and playwright Martin McDonagh, are fairly clearly established. Both wear badges of irreverence and provocation in their writing, and a willingness to tackle – or take pot-shots – at bigger issues, ones that may find them dangling their toes in hot water. But Martin receives the lion’s share of the critical attention, while John is generally recognised as the slightly lesser light. Sure, some might mistake Seven Psychopaths for a John movie, and Calvary for a Martin one, but there’s a more flagrant sense of attention seeking in John’s work, and concomitantly less substance. The Forgiven is clearly aiming more in the expressly substantial vein of John’s earlier Calvary, but it ultimately bears the same kind of issues in delivery.

Haven’t you ever heard of the healing power of laughter?

Batman (1989) (SPOILERS) There’s Jaws , there’s Star Wars , and then there’s Batman in terms of defining the modern blockbuster. Jaws ’ success was so profound, it changed the way movies were made and marketed. Batman’s marketing was so profound, it changed the way tentpoles would be perceived: as cash cows. Disney tried to reproduce the effect the following year with Dick Tracy , to markedly less enthusiastic response. None of this places Batman in the company of Jaws as a classic movie sold well, far from it. It just so happened to hit the spot. As Tim Burton put it, it was “ more of a cultural phenomenon than a great movie ”. It’s difficult to disagree with his verdict that the finished product (for that is what it is) is “ mainly boring ”. Now, of course, the Burton bat has been usurped by the Nolan incarnation (and soon the Snyder). They have some things in common. Both take the character seriously and favour a sombre tone, which was much more of shock to the

Say hello to the Scream Extractor.

Monsters, Inc. (2001) (SPOILERS) I was never the greatest fan of Monsters, Inc. , even before charges began to be levelled regarding its “true” subtext. I didn’t much care for the characters, and I particularly didn’t like the way Pixar’s directors injected their own parenting/ childhood nostalgia into their plots. Something that just seems to go on with their fare ad infinitum. Which means the Pixars I preferred tended to be the Brad Bird ones. You know, the alleged objectivist. Now, though, we learn Pixar has always been about the adrenochrome, so there’s no going back…

I’m just the balloon man.

Copshop (2021) (SPOILERS) A consistent problem with Joe Carnahan’s oeuvre is that, no matter how confidently his movies begin, or how strong his premise, or how adept his direction or compelling the performances he extracts, he ends up blowing it. He blows it with Copshop , a ’70s-inspired variant on Assault on Precinct 13 that is pretty damn good during the first hour, before devolving into his standard mode of sado-nihilistic mayhem.

No one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself.

The Matrix  (1999) (SPOILERS) Twenty years on, and the articles are on the defining nature of The Matrix are piling up, most of them touching on how its world has become a reality, or maybe always was one. At the time, its premise was engaging enough, but it was the sum total of the package that cast a spell – the bullet time, the fashions, the soundtrack, the comic book-as-live-action framing and styling – not to mention it being probably the first movie to embrace and reflect the burgeoning Internet ( Hackers doesn’t really count), and subsequently to really ride the crest of the DVD boom wave. And now? Now it’s still really, really good.

Twenty dwarves took turns doing handstands on the carpet.

Bugsy (1991) (SPOILERS) Bugsy is very much a Warren Beatty vanity project (aren’t they all, even the ones that don’t seem that way on the surface?), to the extent of his playing a title character a decade and a half younger than him. As such, it makes sense that producer Warren’s choice of director wouldn’t be inclined to overshadow star Warren, but the effect is to end up with a movie that, for all its considerable merits (including a script from James Toback chock full of incident), never really feels quite focussed, that it’s destined to lead anywhere, even if we know where it’s going.

When we have been subtle, then can I kill him?

The Avengers 6.16. Legacy of Death There’s scarcely any crediting the Terry Nation of Noon-Doomsday as the same Terry Nation that wrote this, let alone the Terry Nation churning out a no-frills Dalek story a season for the latter stages of the Jon Pertwee era. Of course, Nation had started out as a comedy writer (for Hancock), and it may be that the kick Brian Clemens gave him up the pants in reaction to the quality of Noon-Doomsday loosened a whole load of gags. Admittedly, a lot of them are well worn, but they come so thick and fast in Legacy of Death , accompanied by an assuredly giddy pace from director Don Chaffey (of Ray Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts ) and a fine ensemble of supporting players, that it would be churlish to complain.

Tippy-toe! Tippy-toe!

Seinfeld 2.7: The Phone Message The Premise George and Jerry both have dates on the same night. Neither goes quite as planned, and in George’s case it results in him leaving an abusive message on his girlfriend’s answerphone. The only solution is to steal the tape before she plays it. Observational Further evidence of the gaping chasm between George and Jerry’s approaches to the world. George neurotically attacks his problems and makes them worse, while Jerry shrugs and lets them go. It’s nice to see the latter’s anal qualities announcing themselves, however; he’s so bothered that his girlfriend likes a terrible TV advert that he’s mostly relieved when she breaks things off (“ To me the dialogue rings true ”). Neither Gretchen German (as Donna, Jerry’s date) nor Tory Polone (as Carol, George’s) make a huge impression, but German has more screen time and better dialogue. The main attraction is Jerry’s reactions, which include trying to impress her with hi