Skip to main content

I work for the guys that pay me to watch the guys that pay you. And then there are, I imagine, some guys that are paid to watch me.

The Day of the Dolphin
(1973)

(SPOILERS) Perhaps the most bizarre thing out of all the bizarre things about The Day of the Dolphin is that one of its posters scrupulously sets out its entire dastardly plot, something the movie itself doesn’t outline until fifteen minutes before the end. Mike Nichols reputedly made this – formerly earmarked for Roman Polanski, Jack Nicholson and Sharon Tate, although I’m dubious a specific link can be construed between its conspiracy content and the Manson murders - to fulfil a contract with The Graduate producer Joseph Levine. It would explain the, for him, atypical science-fiction element, something he seems as comfortable with as having a hairy Jack leaping about the place in Wolf.

The Day of the Dolphin would have made much more sense as a Disney movie, one in which a talking dolphin – he’s incredibly endearing, his pre-Gizmo speech provided by screenwriter Buck Henry, it seems – is inveigled into a plot to kill the President of the United States. And he would have too, if it hadn’t been for those meddlesome kids. Sadly, however, there are no meddlesome kids in the actual picture. Instead, only a typically gruff George C Scott, whose choices of material post-Oscar seemed every bit as erratic as they did before he won.

Whatever you think of the plausibility of the movie (try substituting any other given creature into the poster line and see how it sounds: “Unwittingly, he trained a lobster to kill the President of the United States”) the most glaring part is how it never finds a workable structure. The first “act” is all preamble, establishing Dr Jake Terrell (Scott) and his wife Maggie (Trish Van Devere) as trainers of dolphins, teaching them to speak English. But on the sly, such that even their source of funding, the Franklin Foundation, isn’t (to their knowledge) aware of what they’re doing. Thus, the initial conflict is their facing how to deal with the knowledge becoming public.

Paul Sorvino plays (government) agent Mahoney, arriving on the island to take an inconvenient butcher’s, but the implication he’s up to no good turns out to be misdirection; one of Jake’s own staff is ex-military, and once they have been kidnapped, the dolphins are trained to carry a limpet mine to take out the US President’s yacht. Jake and Mahoney never even get to confront the antagonists, who at any rate never set out quite why they’re doing what they’re doing or where their sympathies lie (other than not being with the President). It’s the dolphins themselves who defuse the situation, if not the bomb (the cunning flippers attach it to the villains’ boat instead. Hurrrah!)

The Day of the Dolphin isn’t an unlikeable movie; I might suggest the thriller – or whatever genre blend this purports to be – wasn’t really Nichols’ strong suit, but he did a terrific job with nuke-threat-propaganda picture Silkwood when he returned to narrative cinema after an eight-year absence. The problem is, at its core, Henry’s screenplay, because it has no spine. Or at best a crooked one. Issues of tone come later. As it is, though, I’d much rather watch this than the director’s turgid The Fortune, the picture that caused his sabbatical.

Time Out’s Geoff Andrew – whom I’m guessing isn’t a fan of the director’s oeuvre, called The Day of the DolphinA bizarre and often ridiculous attempt to merge documentary, suspense and comedy that is marginally less silly than Nichols’ best-loved film, The Graduate”. It isn’t ever, though, a comedy, even given that Scott has a few choice lines here and there (in respect of a ruse to get him away from the island, whereby the man he is supposed to see calls in sick, his PA queries “May I tell the director that you asked after him?” His reply: “Only if he lives”).

Pauline Kael’s response was more telling. She was not keen on the cutsie effect the picture had, particularly revolted that the makers “can think of no way to interest us in dolphins except by dubbing them with plaintive, childish voices and turning them into fishy human babies full of love for Pa” (she was clearly so incensed she didn’t remember, or failed to observe, that only one of the dolphins, Alpha, speaks). She further suggested, inaccurately, “The picture will probably upset more children than any other movie since Bambi”; she was referring to the ending, in which Scott spurns the endangered mammals and “forces the whimpering babies to leave their home forever. It’s an ugly-souled, manipulative movie”. Albeit, it seemed to have a strong effect on the few impressionable youngsters who DID see it.

Her outrage suggests its quality of “cheaply effective anthropomorphic tear-jerking” really got to her, despite protesting that “It’s too archaic for adults, and it can be agonising, and finally heart-breaking, to children”. But let’s face it: the ending is little more than a clear inverse of The Jungle Book. Albeit, the separation there is for the safety of the human, whereas here it is “How terrible people are; if only we could be like the dolphins”.

Jake: I always thought you worked for the people that pay you.
Mahoney: I work for the guys that pay me to watch the guys that pay you. And then there are, I imagine, some guys that are paid to watch me.

It was Kael’s view that “The movie exploits Watergate and the assassinations for a despairing attitude towards corruption…” However, the government corruption plot was pre-existing, and can be found in Robert Merle’s 1967 Un animal doué de raison (if different to Henry’s). Additionally, the theme itself is entirely germane to the movie’s ultimate inspiration: the work of Dr John Lilly. That said, everything espoused by cynical Mahoney is pertinent to a jaded take on the establishment. If Kael objected to it, it wasn’t because the substance was unfair, but because it offended her establishment sensibilities. As Mahoney notes of Jake’s naivety: “There are two or three million people working for the government, and that’s not including the military. Did you think E Pluribus Unum was engraved on anything other than our small change? Or hadn’t you been living on this planet?

Dr Lilly was variously influential on cinematic fare, most overtly on The Mind Benders and Ken Russell’s Altered States. He’s generally remembered as one of the foremost minds of the hippy era, in terms of expanding consciousness, having pioneered the use of isolation tanks (Altered States), self-experimenting with them on ketamine, and through his further self-medication discovering higher ET powers watching over us via ECCO Earth Coincidence Control Office (warning of nuclear apocalypse, no less). And, alternately, a presiding SSI – Solid State Intelligence – in the form of a malevolent AI. He tried telling President Ford of the nukes/computers threat. Had a NDE-esque experience. Taught at the dubious Esalen Institute (see Bob & Carol & Ted & Alice). But his background prior to such “achievements” was much less “groovy”. As Charlie Williams observed: “Today, however, Lilly is remembered not as an insidious 1950s brainwashing experimenter, but instead as a guru of the counterculture, the human potential movement, and the 1960s psychedelic scene”. Indeed, there are parallels to Timothy Leary, a CIA informant, in terms of influence; as Lilly had documented ties to the military, assuming they were ever entirely severed would be extremely naïve.

He was at bare minimum known to have briefed the military about his work – in mapping the brain, through implanted electrodes, and isolation tank studies, and if he ostensibly claims to have left NIMH (National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences) because he didn’t want his work used in the field of mind control, he was nevertheless happy to receive funding for his (dolphin-centric) Communications Research Institute from the Air Force, NASA, NIMH, National Science Foundation and the Navy.

So, whether or not he was involved in MKUltra “directly”, he was evidently highly influential on its precepts: “Lilly claimed that the use of sensory isolation, electrostimulation of the brain, and the recording and mapping of brain activity could be used to gain ‘push-button’ control over motivation and behaviour. This research, wrote Lilly, could eventually lead to ‘master-slave controls directly of one brain over another’”.

Notably, when quizzed about his work at the outset, Jake evasively claims “I don’t know anything about the military and the government, and we pay very little attention to each other”. From his NIMH work, Lilly produced Programming and Metaprogramming the Human Biocomputer, “a training manual for the exploration of consciousness, describing how, through using isolation tanks, psychedelic drugs, and meditation techniques, one could learn to program and reprogram one’s brain”. Per Jay Dyer, in an act as proto-MKUltra as it gets, Lilly dosed children in isolation tanks, and quotes him thus: “In the child, automatic metaprogramming implantation (or externally forced metaprogramming) persisting as metaprograms below the levels of awareness in the adult, can be controlling for the later adult programs, adult thinking and adult behaviour. Energy can be taken from some of these automatic metaprograms and transferred to the self-metaprogram with special techniques and special central states, chemically evoked”.

Whatever the ostensible later development of Lilly’s interests, his early work is unmistakable in tone. As Dyer says “With Dr Lilly, the human mind itself is merely a biological computer that could be altered, de-patterned, reprogrammed and modified at will by a handler, and thus an equally complex non-biological computer could also be reconstructed. Once again, we see MK Ultra directly connects to transhumanism”. Williams uses the term “cybernetic spiritualism” to describe Lilly’s work, and it’s a chillingly apt term for the debasement of higher seeking and connection.

Dyer dismissed Lilly’s dolphin work, which included getting them to talk – per The Day of the Dolphin – and dosing them with LSD – not so much – as “preposterous tax payer funded nonsense”. Which it may have been, but Dyer should know better than to assume the kneejerk response. And on the subject thereof, besides the dosing with LSD and the mind control, another area failing to make it into the Nichols movie was the rumpo. To persuade – or assist – the dolphin in counting from two to ten, he was offered a bribe in the form of sex. Since moving him in with his fellow females was too much hard work, his teacher Margaret Lovatt would masturbate him when his sexual urges arose. It’s said he (Peter) died of broken heart when she left him.

It seems that, far from Brave New World – which is a eugenicist telling how it is – influencing Lilly in how not to be, his path took him in the very direction of such applied control (Huxley also influenced Esalen). Scott, Sorvino, and Fritz Weaver (Demon Seed) are very good value, the Bahamas makes for a nice location, and Buck does good dolphin, but yeah, Nichols was the wrong guy for this movie. The Day of the Dolphin either should have been, as suggested, a Disney flick or an all-out psych-out affair, of the sort Russell, Roeg or Cammell might have made. Playing it straight, when it needed to be dosed in LSD, ketamine and excursions into dolphin consciousness, was the wrong move.




Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.