Skip to main content

Okay, pump up the Verbaluce, let’s get ’em talking.


(SPOILERS) Spiderhead’s setup suggests a third-act revelation, or at least stunning dramatic development, that never comes, a deficit that may lead many to feel underwhelmed by Joseph Kosinski’s follow up to Top Gun: Maverick, currently flying high in the box office charts. I wouldn’t say that of it, exactly, but this is undoubtedly a case where the short story lent itself more directly to the anthology show format, lacking sufficient meat for feature expansion.

Abnesti: The time to worry about crossing lines was a lot of lines ago.

Based on George Saunders 2010 New Yorker (short) story Escape from Spiderhead, and adapted by Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick of Deadpool fame – and also 6 Underground, where you’d be willing to believe they considered the lack of a discernible plot a positive boon – Kosinski’s movie is your basic experiment-gone-awry affair, one replete with all the polished production values you expect of a Kosinski movie.

Indeed, the director’s first two big screen outings were striking for their evocative combination of soundtrack and visuals – if also criticised as offering little beyond the two – and here he is similarly demonstrative. Albeit, adopting a decidedly ironic pop sensibility this time, one that decidedly gets the better of the contributions from regular composer Joseph Trapanese. Since they are frequently the diegetic selections of Chris Hemsworth’s Steve Abnesti, supervisor of a test programme on volunteer inmates of the Spiderhead penitentiary, these are often obtuse, self-congratulating or showy numbers, such as She Blind Me with Science and More Than This. Indeed, Kosinski’s high-res sheen, juxtaposed with yesteryear’s chart hits, lends itself to the oeuvre of Damon Lindelof (whose Lost had its share of experiments and pop tunes). I don’t think it’s all together successful; the way Kosinski, not I feel a natural comedian, does it, it’s studied rather than genuinely witty/clever, not unlike the way Kubrick couldn’t resist sledgehammering the crass komedy in A Clockwork Orange, which you might argue was his intent, but you might then argue whether the effect was wholly successful. Nevertheless, there’s no denying his skill with presentation.

Variety’s Peter Debruge was of the view Spiderhead gets everything wrong, perhaps because he’s stuck firmly in a compare-and-contrast with the short story (“Situations like these… are very hard to make funny when performed by real people” – who exactly thought they were supposed to be, Peter? There’s clearly a queasy intent with the juxtapositions, the musical ones especially). He can also be found making bizarre remarks about “badly staged fistfights and low-budget explosions”; the last thing Spiderhead looks is low budget. It’s consummately crafted. Jordan Ruimy has it pegged as costing $100m, although who knows what Netflix movies really cost, since they’re accounting is shockingly suspect; never forget The Irishman supposedly cost $250m. (For reference, never read a Variety review unless you’ve seen the movie first, as they eagerly dump the plot on you without warning you first of spoilers.)

Abnesti: You know this is science, Jeff. And in science, we have to explore the unknown.

I disagree with Debruge’s overall take, then, to the extent that – aside from letting a movie be its own thing, beyond the source material – Spiderhead is at least partially successful in establishing tone, rhythm and dramatic thrust. With regard to Hemsworth, he’s playing Abnesti as appreciably prickish and oblivious to his subjects’ needs, in a sociopathic, omniscient manner (so a caricature of misspent science, which is clearly the intent). The problem is that you’re constantly aware of Hemsworth using the ironic delivery tricks he’s increasingly known for – Waititi and his funny take on Thor – which quickly go towards making the performance a little tiresome, rather than electrifying. Guy Pearce might have been a better Australian to navigate the queasy/funny/alpha-nerdy/immoral Abnesti roadmap.

Jeff: Why do we keep saying yes? Acknowledge, acknowledge, acknowledge.
Lizzy: All the times you said yes, why did you?
Jeff: I guess I felt like I deserved it.

Debruge identifies the Milgram experiments as a source of inspiration – measuring obedience to authority to the end of inflicting pain on others – but that’s only one part of Spiderhead’s remit. Much of it revolves around the motives of the experimenter rather than the “teacher” and “learner”. We eventually learn the various drugs being administered – inducing heightened chemical responses according to desired condition, administered via implants at the base of the spine, and going under a variety of names such as Luvactin (sexual response) Verbaluce (verbal expression) and Darkenfloxx (unspecified nightmarish experiences) as well as one that encourages consumptive behaviour (regurgitation then continued ingestion being the order of the test) – are mere adornments to the testing of B-6, Obediex.

Abnesti: The goal wasn’t obedience. It was absolute obedience without exceptions.

Where Kosinski, Reese and Wenick come unstuck with the B-6 reveal is that there’s insufficient evidence it’s this alone that is driving the subjects to “Acknowledge” every time. Indeed, we very much see a standard situation of disinclination towards the tests (except maybe BeBe Bettencourt’s Emma with regard to sex), with the element pushing compliance being the fear of returning to a standard-issue state facility. I found myself asking, without the impetus of B-6, how different would the order of acknowledgement be?

If that’s dissatisfying, so is the weak-sauce guilt of our lead characters. Jeff’s crime is getting loaded and crashing his car, killing his friend and girlfriend, while Lizzy’s is neglect (she forgot her baby in her car, who died). They’re obviously calibrated as sins the viewer will forgive; in Lizzy’s case, given the build-up, it’s a distinctly anticlimactic crime. It’s made clear to us they aren’t your usual locked-up psychos and certainly don’t really deserve to remain that way (but again, given the distinction from some of the loons we meet, why do we think those inmates would have any qualms about saying yes every time, regardless of Obediex, Darkenfloxx excepted)?

Jeff: Sometimes, it’s hard to remember who I was before I came here.

The Spiderhead Chronicles resolves itself with Jeff (Miles Teller) calling the police and escaping the island with Lizzy (Jurnee Smollett) as Abnesti crashes his plane into a mountain: all rather underwhelming. As ever with current fare, I was given pause to consider possible allusions to the prevailing paradigm. In this interpretation, Abnesti represents the Elite or controllers, while the penitentiary/island is the Earth realm. We’re the inmates, programmed to acknowledge compliantly each time some new horror is thrown our way and accept rather than reject it. We have no capacity to do otherwise, because we don’t even know we are being fed the compliance drug (being the conditions of the lie we are raised under). We will thus, by our “complicity” agree to rules to the detriment of our fellow inmates (on whatever level).

The desire to go back (Jeff) is to return to the state before this condition of rule arrived. The problem being, the details of that condition become ever sketchier (whether one wants to characterise that as generational obscurity post-reset incident, or the amnesia of reincarnation). Naturally, the aim of the Elite is to initiate total control of the mind, to produce “A world filled with people who do exactly as they’re told. Behave not as they want but as they damn well should”, and as per the volunteers’ implants, this may be achieved via the route of transhumanism.

Jeff: I wish there was a self-forgiveness drug. You take it and everything starts over… But there’s no drug like that. So we’re gonna have to do it for ourselves.

Kosinski may well have been hoping to prove he wasn’t just a technical maestro throwing pretty pictures onto the screen. I don’t know he’s exactly achieved that, since Maverick is going great (top) guns, while this, if initial IMDB and critical response is any indication, is going down like a bag of cold sick. But Spiderhead isn’t a bad movie; it just leaves you questioning whether it should have been a movie.

Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.