Skip to main content

Get away from my burro!

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

(SPOILERS) The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is beloved by so many of the cinematic firmament’s luminaries – Stanley Kubrick, Sam Raimi, , Paul Thomas Anderson and who knows maybe also WS, Vince Gilligan, Spike Lee, Daniel Day Lewis; Oliver Stone was going to remake it – not to mention those anteriorly influential Stone Roses, that it seems foolhardy to suggest it isn’t quite all that. There’s no faulting the performances – a career best Humphrey Bogart, with director John Huston’s dad Walter stealing the movie from under him – but the greed-is-bad theme is laid on a little thick, just in case you were a bit too dim to get it yourself the first time, and Huston’s direction may be right there were it counts for the dramatics, but it’s a little too relaxed when it comes to showing the seams between Mexican location and studio.

Howard: Believe it or not, I knew a fellow who could smell gold like a jackass can smell water.

Which wasn’t unusual for the time, of course – it didn’t stop the director winning the relevant Oscar – but it tends to undercut the proceedings that bit more when there’s otherwise a prevailing emphasis on verisimilitude. Particularly when you see a production that got it in the neck from Jack Warner for going over budget, and yet the cast are hacking their way through a BBC jungle, complete with “naturalistic” sound effects.

Huston adapted B Traven’s 1927 novel himself (which features an interlude involving small-pox vaccination absent from the movie), granting pappy a tailor-made part… Albeit, pappy blanched at the idea he was no longer a leading man, despite being in his mid-sixties. Consequently, many of the movie’s less-legitimate incidents are the fault of the source material, rather than John, although he could be argued to have failed to hone the work. The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is very accurate to the novel, whereby Fred C Dobbs (Bogart) and Cob Curtin (Tim Holt) hook up with elder prospector Howard (elder Huston), and through trial and error strike it rich in the Sierra Madre mountains. Alas, the false idol that is greed gets the better of them – and most specifically Dobbs – and their duh-reams are dashed.

Essentially, then, Huston didn’t need to reposition the novel to the needs of Hollywood codes; it was quite moralistic enough as it was. Nor did he need to include slightly egregious and unbelievable plot developments, since there were more than enough. There are changes; while Bruce Bennett’s inveigling prospector James Cody is in the novel (as Lacaud), his fate differs from that of the movie, where he is very conveniently shot by bandits before Dobbs and Curtin can make good on their threat to do for him. Also omitted is the reveal that Curtin is a socialist, along with Dobbs’ death by decapitation.

Otherwise, Huston is respectful to the tenuous means of separating Howard from the gold-heavy returning party – local villagers insist he comes with them to show gratitude for his life-saving skills, or they’ll show ingratitude by getting aggro? – Curtin being shot at point blank range yet surviving, and the kind of stupid Mexican bandits who give you average stupid Mexican bandits a bad name (pouring gold to the winds in the belief it’s sand).

Dobbs: Shut your trap! Shut up, or I’ll smash your head flat.

On the “Gold! Gold!” front, there’s unsightly telegraphing of its effects on the psyche, via Howard’s upbeat relation of his own experiences (“As long as there’s no find, the noble brotherhood will last”) and the scarcely credible idea that Dobbs is somehow decent at heart despite all evidence to the contrary (the idea being that even supposedly decent people go doolally with such temptation). He’s not a natural killer, you know. It’s the gold! The Sobering letter from Cody to his wife is also a bit unnecessary.

Nevertheless, when it comes to the group’s internal tensions, Huston – who cameos as a white-suited benefactor giving Dobbs pesos – is rock solid, with the gradations from Howard’s balanced equanimity, to Curtin’s moderate sense of what’s fair, to Dobbs paranoid rancour. This kind of thing can end up very silly, if there isn’t a sure hand at the tiller, as evidenced by Lee’s abject Da 5 Bloods, and there have been any number of knock-offs where the protagonists are inevitably undone by their lust for fortune (from Three Kings, to The Italian Job, to Triple Frontier). The final joke – Howard’s hilarity at the irony of it all – “The gold has gone back to where we found it!” – could as easily have been choking on over-egged 22 carrot cake, but Huston’s tickled delivery lets it through the gate (again, the actual exchange is pretty much wholesale from the novel)

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is, of course, most famous for its peasant-bandit oath “I don’t have to show you any stinkin’ badges!”, a line most will probably recognise, even if they don’t know the movie itself (it’s neat that Alfonso Bedoya’s Gold Hat reappears to administer justice to Dobbs, less so that he underlines what a numbskull he is). The picture did incredibly well at the Oscars, winning three of its four nominations (Director, Best Supporting Actor Huston and Screenplay, only losing to Sir Larry’s Hamlet, although the real cinematic marvel of the year’s nomineees is arguably Powell and Pressburger’s The Red Shoes). Bogey wasn’t even nominated for Dobbs, having to do with an award for the markedly inferior The African Queen four years later (another Huston picture that suffers from the stark contrast between studio and location, and rightly parodied by Bob Hope and Bing Crosby).

Hope, of course, was alleged facilitator of MKUltra sex slaves to the stars of Hollywood and political office, per Brice Taylor. Huston around this time was also up to his eyeballs in depravity – allegedly again – as associate of the – ditto allegedly – Black Dahlia murderer George Hodel. Rather like a certain former BBC presenter, it isn’t as if anyone would possibly make the mistake of suggesting Huston looked like such a nice man.

Dobbs: I just don’t like being called a hog, that’s all.

Pauline Kael suggested that the first section of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre was a masterpiece in miniature, “so sure and lucid it’s as good as anything John Huston ever did”, and I’d agree with that; the rest of the picture can’t equal it, which is unfortunate, as the rest of it is the meat and potatoes. Dobbs was also an inspiration for Indy (the fedora) and the push-pull of fortune and glory versus things belonging in a museum (where they can be misidentified, mislabelled and contribute to the wholesale obfuscation of bona-fide history). Obviously, Lucasfilm was being less overt, gritty and severe. But then, you watch the last scene in The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, and you’ll probably double take at the retreat from the sober depths of the movie you thought you’d just witnessed.

Popular posts from this blog

I’m smarter than a beaver.

Prey (2022) (SPOILERS) If nothing else, I have to respect Dan Trachtenberg’s cynical pragmatism. How do I not only get a project off the ground, but fast-tracked as well? I know, a woke Predator movie! Woke Disney won’t be able to resist! And so, it comes to pass. Luckily for Prey , it gets to bypass cinemas and so the same sorry fate of Lightyear . Less fortunately, it’s a patience-testing snook cocking at historicity (or at least, assumed historicity), in which a young, pint-sized Comanche girl who wishes to hunt and fish – and doubtless shoot to boot – with the big boys gets to take on a Predator and make mincemeat of him. Well, of course , she does. She’s a girl, innit?

If you ride like lightning, you're going to crash like thunder.

The Place Beyond the Pines (2012) (SPOILERS) There’s something daringly perverse about the attempt to weave a serious-minded, generation-spanning saga from the hare-brained premise of The Place Beyond the Pines . When he learns he is a daddy, a fairground stunt biker turns bank robber in order to provide for his family. It’s the kind of “only-in-Hollywood” fantasy premise you might expect from a system that unleashed Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man and Point Break on the world. But this is an indie-minded movie from the director of the acclaimed Blue Valentine ; it demands respect and earnest appraisal. Unfortunately it never recovers from the abject silliness of the set-up. The picture is littered with piecemeal characters and scenarios. There’s a hope that maybe the big themes will even out the rocky terrain but in the end it’s because of this overreaching ambition that the film ends up so undernourished. The inspiration for the movie

I’m the famous comedian, Arnold Braunschweiger.

Last Action Hero (1993) (SPOILERS) Make no mistake, Last Action Hero is a mess. But even as a mess, it might be more interesting than any other movie Arnie made during that decade, perhaps even in his entire career. Hellzapoppin’ (after the 1941 picture, itself based on a Broadway revue) has virtually become an adjective to describe films that comment upon their own artifice, break the fourth wall, and generally disrespect the convention of suspending disbelief in the fictions we see parading across the screen. It was fairly audacious, some would say foolish, of Arnie to attempt something of that nature at this point in his career, which was at its peak, rather than playing it safe. That he stumbled profoundly, emphatically so since he went up against the behemoth that is Jurassic Park (slotted in after the fact to open first), should not blind one to the considerable merits of his ultimate, and final, really, attempt to experiment with the limits of his screen persona.

Everyone creates the thing they dread.

Avengers: Age of Ultron (2015) (SPOILERS) Avengers: Age of Ultron ’s problem isn’t one of lack. It benefits from a solid central plot. It features a host of standout scenes and set pieces. It hands (most of) its characters strong defining moments. It doesn’t even suffer now the “wow” factor of seeing the team together for the first time has subsided. Its problem is that it’s too encumbered. Maybe its asking to much of a director to effectively martial the many different elements required by an ensemble superhero movie such as this, yet Joss Whedon’s predecessor feels positively lean in comparison. Part of this is simply down to the demands of the vaster Marvel franchise machine. Seeds are laid for Captain America: Civil War , Infinity Wars I & II , Black Panther and Thor: Ragnarok . It feels like several spinning plates too many. Such activity occasionally became over-intrusive on previous occasions ( Iron Man II ), but there are points in Age of Ultron whe

Death to Bill and Ted!

Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey (1991) (SPOILERS) The game of how few sequels are actually better than the original is so well worn, it was old when Scream 2 made a major meta thing out of it (and it wasn’t). Bill & Ted Go to Hell , as Bill & Ted’s Bogus Journey was originally called, is one such, not that Excellent Adventure is anything to be sneezed at, but this one’s more confident, even more playful, more assured and more smartly stupid. And in Peter Hewitt it has a director with a much more overt and fittingly cartoonish style than the amiably pedestrian Stephen Herrick. Evil Bill : First, we totally kill Bill and Ted. Evil Ted : Then we take over their lives. My recollection of the picture’s general consensus was that it surpassed the sleeper hit original, but Rotten Tomatoes’ review aggregator suggests a less universal response. And, while it didn’t rock any oceans at the box office, Bogus Journey and Point Break did quite nicely for Keanu Reev

I think it’s pretty clear whose side the Lord’s on, Barrington.

Monte Carlo or Bust aka  Those Daring Young Men in Their Jaunty Jalopies (1969) (SPOILERS) Ken Annakin’s semi-sequel to Those Magnificent Men in Their Flying Machines tends to be rather maligned, usually compared negatively to its more famous predecessor. Which makes me rather wonder if those expressing said opinion have ever taken the time to scrutinise them side by side. Or watch them back to back (which would be more sensible). Because Monte Carlo or Bust is by far the superior movie. Indeed, for all its imperfections and foibles (not least a performance from Tony Curtis requiring a taste for comic ham), I adore it. It’s probably the best wacky race movie there is, simply because each set of competitors, shamelessly exemplifying a different national stereotype (albeit there are two pairs of Brits, and a damsel in distress), are vibrant and cartoonish in the best sense. Albeit, it has to be admitted that, as far as said stereotypes go, Annakin’s home side win

Just because you are a character doesn't mean that you have character.

Pulp Fiction (1994) (SPOILERS) From a UK perspective, Pulp Fiction ’s success seemed like a fait accompli; Reservoir Dogs had gone beyond the mere cult item it was Stateside and impacted mainstream culture itself (hard to believe now that it was once banned on home video); it was a case of Tarantino filling a gap in the market no one knew was there until he drew attention to it (and which quickly became over-saturated with pale imitators subsequently). Where his debut was a grower, Pulp Fiction hit the ground running, an instant critical and commercial success (it won the Palme d’Or four months before its release), only made cooler by being robbed of the Best Picture Oscar by Forrest Gump . And unlike some famously-cited should-have-beens, Tarantino’s masterpiece really did deserve it.

This entire edifice you see around you, built on jute.

Jeeves and Wooster 3.3: Cyril and the Broadway Musical  (aka Introduction on Broadway) Well, that’s a relief. After a couple of middling episodes, the third season bounces right back, and that's despite Bertie continuing his transatlantic trip. Clive Exton once again plunders  Carry On, Jeeves  but this time blends it with a tale from  The Inimitable Jeeves  for the brightest spots, as Cyril Basington-Basington (a sublimely drippy Nicholas Hewetson) pursues his stage career against Aunt Agatha's wishes.

Poetry in translation is like taking a shower with a raincoat on.

Paterson (2016) (SPOILERS) Spoiling a movie where nothing much happens is difficult, but I tend to put the tag on in a cautionary sense much of the time. Paterson is Jim Jarmusch at his most inert and ambient but also his most rewardingly meditative. Paterson (Adam Driver), a bus driver and modest poet living in Paterson, New Jersey, is a stoic in a fundamental sense, and if he has a character arc of any description, which he doesn’t really, it’s the realisation that is what he is. Jarmusch’s picture is absent major conflict or drama; the most significant episodes feature Paterson’s bus breaking down, the English bull terrier Marvin – whom Paterson doesn’t care for but girlfriend Laura (Golshifteh Farahani) dotes on – destroying his book of poetry, and an altercation at the local bar involving a gun that turns out to be a water pistol. And Paterson takes it all in his stride, genial to the last, even the ruination of his most earnest, devoted work (the only disappoint

Your Mickey Mouse is one big stupid dope!

Enemy Mine (1985) (SPOILERS) The essential dynamic of Enemy Mine – sworn enemies overcome their differences to become firm friends – was a well-ploughed one when it was made, such that it led to TV Tropes assuming, since edited, that it took its title from an existing phrase (Barry Longyear, author of the 1979 novella, made it up, inspired by the 1961 David Niven film The Best of Enemies ). The Film Yearbook Volume 5 opined that that Wolfgang Petersen’s picture “ lacks the gritty sauciness of Hell in the Pacific”; John Boorman’s WWII film stranded Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune on a desert island and had them first duking it out before becoming reluctant bedfellows. Perhaps germanely, both movies were box office flops.